PR Activations: The Good, and the Bad, and the Ugly

In this day and age, brands must go above and beyond to get noticed. Companies who have strived to get awareness have found creative ways to truly interact with their target audiences. Brand activations are what allow a brand to provide unique experiences to consumers in a more personal and direct way. Have you ever been scrolling through social media or an online news outlet, and seen a crazy publicity stunt being done to promote a new product or movie? Maybe you have been out in public and found yourself an active participant in an activation. This is done intentionally to capture your attention and get you to engage with the brand. A successful activation makes people stop, stare, and eventually act. Some brands will do almost anything to get the attention of the public, even if it means creating chaos and controversy. While we will go over several brands that have been successful in their activations, we will review some others that did not quite make the mark. 

SMILE 

To get the desired attention, a brand must do something out of the ordinary. Paramount Pictures did exactly this in promotion of their psychological-horror film, “Smile. The film, which hit theaters on September 30, 2022, focuses on a woman that is being tormented and haunted by smiling people who appear possessed. In efforts to promote the new movie, Paramount Pictures’ promotion team came up with the compelling idea to buy tickets and strategically place actors in different seats throughout a televised Mets and Yankees game. For all nine innings, the actors stood straight up in their seats, chillingly smiling from ear to ear, while looking straight into the camera. 

Did it work? Yes it did! The activation was able to create a ton of buzz around the film. According to Deadline, the film made over $100 million at the Global Box Office only two weeks after its release. The stunt quickly went viral on social media platforms like Twitter, with one post receiving over 50k likes and 2.8k retweets. The activation was a total success, something Paramount can thank the smiling actors for. 

Film journalist, Erik Davis shared on Twitter, “Here’s some fun, clever movie promo – Paramount seemingly placed #Smile actors in the crowd at both the Yankees and Mets games last night, both in view of cameras,” he continued, “The results were indeed creepy. Going to a game this weekend? Watch out for the smiles!”

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 

There is no predicting the extreme lengths that brands will go to in order to promote themselves. Sometimes, activations can be terrifying, shocking, and even dangerous which just goes to show that a brand will do almost anything to catch the eye of its target consumer. When action-thriller “Mission Impossible III” was released in theaters in April of 2006, the Paramount Pictures promotion team came up with a marketing campaign involving placing red digital boxes covered in wires in 4,500 newspaper dispensers around Los Angeles, CA. These devices were meant to look like the bombs used in the film. When the dispenser’s door would open, these boxes would play the film’s theme song aloud. 

Did it work? No, they completely bombed it. This activation resulted in innocent bystanders believing that there was an actual bomb right in front of their faces, leading them to think they were in immediate danger and calling the authorities. Police got involved and eventually, a bomb squad was called into the area to evacuate a nearby building with over 300 people in it. 

“With the wires leading to the micro-switch on the news rack doors, I can easily see how someone might have misconstrued it as an improvised explosive device,” – Los Angeles sheriff’s sergeant at the time, Mike LaPerruque. 

This activation completely backfired and left Paramount Pictures, the Los Angeles Times, and the company’s advertising firm to pay $75,000 in negligence claims from the incident. This failed activation was a result of the promotions team not thinking the stunt all the way through and neglecting to think of the consequences of putting fake bombs around a huge city. 

“This was the least intended outcome. We weren’t expecting anything like this.” – John O’Loughlin,  Los Angeles Times Senior Vice President of Marketing, Planning and Development.

DIESEL

Shifting from Paramount Pictures, we focus our attention on the fashion brand, Diesel. In 2018, the company known for its denim and t-shirts decided to poke fun at the many bootleg shops that can be found along New York City’s Canal Street through a thorough brand activation. The clothing brand opened its very own store containing what appeared to be knockoff Diesel products. All items had “Diesel” purposely misspelled and printed across the front. The off-brand products caught many bystanders’ attention and lured them into the shop. Little did the consumers know, the products with the misspelled Diesel logo were actually real pieces made by the brand’s design team. 

Now, you’re probably wondering – did the activation work? It sure did. What started as a brand activation stunt quickly became a pop-up shop event. Rapper Gucci Mane, who was sponsored by the brand at the time, took to social media to tell his Instagram followers about the shop. Not long after, a line was wrapped around the outside of the store full of eager consumers willing to purchase the misspelled Diesel products. The activation was an effective way to promote the brand and its upcoming collection it had been set to release.

“The beauty of this idea is when we were telling them it was real, we were actually telling the truth! And they won’t believe it. It’s almost like a brain tease. ‘It is real!’ ‘No, it’s not real!’ ‘No, it is real!’ That’s the joy of this idea.” –  Andy Bird, Chief Creative Officer of Publicis New York 

BUILD A BEAR 

What may sound like a great idea can easily turn into a PR disaster, which is exactly what Build-A-Bear experienced in 2018 when the company tried introducing its Pay Your Age Day at  stores worldwide. The one-day promotion allowed for buyers to purchase a bear, which normally cost anywhere between $14 and $40, for the amount of however old the individual was. The large turnout for the promotions resulted in long lines forming in front of the stores hours before the workshop even opened, creating as long as 8-hour waits to get in. 

Did the activation work? Maybe for a few hours! Once the evening rolled around, Build-A-Bear franchises began turning away consumers and shutting their doors. The company’s representatives took to social media to explain that there was an unexpected and overwhelming response to the promotion, however, they were willing to offer $15 vouchers to consumers who got turned away. Between losing customers and facing inventory troubles, Build-A-Bear definitely overestimated its abilities when planning this promotion. This example goes to show that in fact, PR activations take significant time dedicated towards preparation and thoughtful planning to be successfully executed. 

Whether a brand is trying to get the word out about its new movie, clothing line or product promotion, a PR activation is an interactive and effective way to generate awareness and grasp the attention of consumers. This is an important aspect of a campaign, as it allows a brand to genuinely connect with the public and get people excited about what’s yet to come.

How can a brand indicate whether its activation was successful or not? In order to determine this, companies must see how many people they were able to reach as a result of the activation. These days, social media plays a huge part in receiving brand awareness. Many brands utilize social media platforms to interact with their target audience after an activation and track social engagement. The most successful brand activations may end up going viral on social media or even make the daily news. 

As brands continue to create new things, we will continue to see them try to step out of the box and come up with innovative ways to get the public’s attention. That also means we will continue to see some brands fail miserably, and others completely thrive while trying to do so. As long as brands remain focused on creating engaging and memorable experiences for their consumers, PR activations will continue being heavily utilized in the industry time and time again. 

Sources

https://deadline.com/2022/10/smile-crosses-100-million-global-box-office-1235142552/

https://musebycl.io/fashion-beauty/how-diesel-disarmed-enemy-its-own-brilliant-knockoff-store

https://twitter.com/PopBase/status/1575945713766191104?s=20&t=2UNwcTKgMJ2aeKfl6BtCiQ

https://twitter.com/buildabear/status/1017504161292800000?s=20&t=ZamMEBZdiOEjl4ulHtfb_Q

https://www.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2018/07/12/build-a-bear-deal-orig.cnnmoney 

https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/tom-and-the-bomb-20060502-gdngnc.html 

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-apr-29-me-racks29-story.html

https://twitter.com/PopBase/status/1575945713766191104?s=20&t=2UNwcTKgMJ2aeKfl6BtCiQ 

https://www.gradschools.com/degree-guide/how-many-ads-do-you-see-each-day 

By Dominique DeVivo

Inside look at Failed Campaigns

Behind-the-scenes factors play a vital part in successful campaigns. Many fashion brands are under a microscope with their large customer fanbases. One wrong move may result in a backlash from countless consumers. Not only do these failed strategies reflect badly on the company, but often result in a decline in customer sales and a lost connection between the brand and its target consumer. Developing a relationship between the brand and the consumer can be beneficial to the company’s success. Forming a bond between the two allows trust to build between the brand and the consumer. Breaking this bond will steer away customers and damage the trust that was built. Ideally, consumers want to feel a personal connection to the brand that promotes and reflects their values. Focusing on where these three notorious fashion brands H&M, Victoria’s Secret and Dolce & Gabanna went wrong in their campaign process.

H&M’s Greenwashing

Fashion trends are fleeting, and many stores have responded by using textiles that are cheap but not recyclable. Textile waste is a huge problem for the environment.

“Next to oil, fashion in its broadest sense, fast fashion, to leather to denim, is the next biggest industrial polluter of the world’s waterways.”

Filmmaker Mark Angelo in his documentary, RiverBlue.

H&M saw backlash from their scorecard system that was created to show how environmentally friendly their products were. H&M’s positioning as an environmentally conscious company proved to be flawed when false information arose from the scorecards. The company claimed products to be better for the environment than they actually were. False claims were also unveiled when the company claimed these products were sustainable, in reality, they were not.

H&M is now seen as a fashion company that doesn’t tell the truth about its involvement in environmental issues. In-store recycling bins have been put in place with the goal to revitalize garments into new clothing. Only 35% of the clothing that was collected went to be recycled.

Victoria’s Secret Failed Body Inclusivity

Victoria’s Secret, a world-renowned brand most known for intimates is also known for its models ranging in smaller sizes compared to the average woman. As of 2014 competitor brand, Aerie has prided itself on unretouched photography and specifically in its AerieReal campaign. This campaign from Aerie brought both success and consumer loyalty to the brand. The campaign focused on leaving all photos raw and unedited which positioned Aerie as a brand that wants its consumers to feel happy in their own skin. Aerie took this opportunity to showcase women of all different shapes and sizes which is something that Victoria’s Secret was failing to do all along.

 The Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, a major event in this industry has not only put an image of beauty into young minds but has continued to showcase models that decreased in size as the show continued to gain fame. This breach of trust damaged the bond between the consumer and the brand. Despite all of this Victoria’s Secret has attempted to rebrand its company and image by utilizing models of all size ranges. In 2015 they released a campaign that claimed to have lingerie for all body types. Once again, they failed their customers and missed the mark by showcasing models of similar sizes and no diversity among them. VS’s rebranding was a poor strategic idea due to the fact their image was not changing. After receiving backlash for years, they continued to follow the same strategy.

“Collectively, models shrank roughly two inches across their bustlines, one inch around their waistlines, and nearly half an inch off their hiplines. The models’ average dress size decreased from 5.2 to 3.7 over the same span of time. Despite these dramatic differences, their WHR and height stayed nearly identical.

Gina Digravio

Their idea of beauty has shaped millions of young women’s perceptions of what their ideal bodies should be. This beauty standard Victoria’s Secret stands behind was never targeted to women of all sizes. Victoria’s Secret has proved multiple times that it is positioned towards men’s standards of women and does not pertain to women of all sizes.

Victoria’s Secret allowed a competitor brand to lure customers away from them by appealing to all women, something that VS failed to accomplish.  

Dolce & Gabanna Sneakers

While many public relations campaigns succeed, that’s not always the case. As campaigns continue to evolve, several questions come to mind. Where do campaigns go wrong? What campaigns from large companies have failed in their strategy? The campaign process is always talked about, but where the campaigns go wrong is a different story. Defining these disconnects in the pr strategy increases consumer awareness of what not to do when developing a campaign.

Dolce & Gabanna, the luxury company known for its Mediterranean style, is also missing the mark. In 2017 a sneaker hit the market that caused a commotion in the marketplace. The sneaker retailed for $973 remarked, “I’m thin and gorgeous” in large font on the side of the shoe. The shoe was first released to the public at Milan Men’s Fashion Week. Not only did this shoe reveal a lack of body inclusivity it directly reflected back on the brand and its image.

“Though there may be an element of cheeky humor at play in the design of these sneakers, equating thinness and beauty with success and status is a message that hurts everyone.”

Claire Mysko, CEO of the National Eating Disorders Association

Dolce & Gabanna’s designer, Stefano Gabanna, responded to comments that seemed to only make the situation worse. Gabanna went to social media to repost articles that addressed the sneaker in a bad light. Gabanna’s Instagram caption responding to this issue said, “When idiocy distorts reality…next time we’ll write LOVE TO BE FAT AND FULL OF CHOLESTEROL…the most stupid post ever.” Not only did Dolce & Gabanna spark a sensitive topic with this shoe they also seemed to have no initiative in addressing the matter at hand.

The Necessary Change Today

These fashion companies have not only failed in their PR strategy but also their loyal customers. Maybe the solution is not with the strategy but within the company itself. Many companies forget the importance of adjusting to our evolving world. Opening your brand to changes also opens the door to more successful campaigns. We know that change is necessary and companies in the future need to react to these failed processes and learn from them.

Many steps can be put in place to prevent these pr strategies mentioned from happening again. Some strategies to follow when developing a campaign include understanding your target audience and their wants and needs, being sensitive to tough topics and issues, bringing in multiple ideas and diverse opinions when formulating a new campaign, and being open to change. Every PR campaign is different and discussing the bad may ultimately form the good.

Sources:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/retailwire/2022/07/13/hm-case-shows-how-greenwashing-breaks-brand-promise/?sh=2a58fa5a1171

https://www.popdust.com/victorias-secret-failed-rebrand-2657667356.html#:~:text=The%20Rebrand%20To%20Fail%20All,legs%20and%20a%20flat%20stomach.

https://www.businessinsider.com/dolce-and-gabbana-responds-to-critics-of-his-thin-and-gorgeous-shoes-2017-4#:~:text=The%20INSIDER%20Summary%3A,’m%20thin%20%26%20gorgeous.%22

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/dolce-gabbana-thin-and-gorgeous-shoes

www.forbes.com/sites/rachellebergstein/2017/04/26/is-fashion-experiencing-its-own-pc-backlash/?sh=3c79ab494edb

Up ↑